Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 227%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 23:15
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 168
2-Core 334
108% 199 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,231
111% 935 Pts
64-Core 2,262
140% 2,262 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 256
Parallax 490
207% 333 fps
MRender 381
Gravity 200
Splatting 290
236% 291 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 194%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ1LB960HAJQ-000MV 960GB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDA78M5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 969 969 971 973 972 973 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 969
Mixed 922
SusWrite 971
267% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 67.5
236% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,117
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 1,054
769% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 254%
Great: 254%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$120
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01KF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 36 33 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 136
Write 114
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 43.5
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 96%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.6
8% 7.85 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 16%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$35
69GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 309 252 205 328 262 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 46.7
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 33.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 139%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELD054 DELL S2240L
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $896
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback