Today's hottest deals

Jginyue B460M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJginyue B460M  (all builds)
MotherboardJGINYUE B460M
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 22:00
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 249
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 721
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 0939) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 6.5
6% 7.5 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 6.6
6% 7.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 154 152 151 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 448
Write 158
Mixed 184
SusWrite 152
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 35.7
139% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 189
161% 243 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 88%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
111GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 136 135 134 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 393
Write 138
Mixed 205
SusWrite 136
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 27.9
109% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 160
128% 184 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 77%
WL150GLSA16100 150GB
140GB free
Firmware: 01.06D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 128 126 125 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 70.1
Write 93.2
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 126
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 2% 44 66 49 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR0429 Acer T272HL
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B
Typical B460M Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Jginyue B460M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback