Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GS63VR 7RG
MotherboardMSI MS-16K3  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 163
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 373
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11E9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 99
Parallax 5.9
4% 36.7 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$74
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 199 198 195 193 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1066
Write 796
Mixed 447
SusWrite 242
141% 638 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 41.9
158% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 579
488% 720 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 141%
Great: 236%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
247GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 50 53 66 59 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 48.1
Write 62
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 48.4
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.8% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 18
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 5R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 24% 49 101 5 120 15.5" 1920 1080 CMN15F4
History: Score 44: 4R 7G 3B | Score 34: 5R 1G 6B
Typical MS-16K3 Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16K3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback