Dell XPS 15 9560

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 15 9560  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05FFDN
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 19:44
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 209
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 124
41% 261 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 07BE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4270
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 30.3
25% 32.4 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 19.4
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 1175 1154 1158 1153 1132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,801
Write 1,522
Mixed 908
SusWrite 1,150
301% 1,345 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 66.5
231% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 581
DQ Mixed 293
340% 595 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 247%
Great: 294%
Samsung SSD 860 PRO 1TB
785GB free, PID 235c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.2% Above average
Read 36.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 34
SusWrite 18.6
39% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 13.3
986% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 13.4
987% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.7 9 10 8.3 9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 14
Write 20.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 9.3
21% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.3
180% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 19.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 15 9560 Builds (Compare 4,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9560 - $1,300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback