bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 00:14
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 77.2
36% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 72.4
8-Core 73.5
10% 72.9 Pts
64-Core 79.1
5% 79.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 50 31 7.5 47 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 200
Write 132
Mixed 162
SusWrite 44.4
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 10.7
42% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 13.2
DQ Mixed 15.5
12% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 17GB
14GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 37 23 6.1 34 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 174
Write 189
Mixed 182
SusWrite 33.9
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 6.6
1,116% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 7168 MB
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 0 32 0" 1600 900
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback