Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 12:36
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1150
101% 860 Pts
64-Core 2,078
129% 2,078 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 98.1
Reflection 169
Parallax 101
80% 123 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 100
81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 479GB
85GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 104 85 92 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 457
Write 942
Mixed 528
SusWrite 111
115% 510 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 25.6
93% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 48.7
138% 279 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 162%
Amd-raid Array 1 499GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 1012 1013 1017 1016 1016 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,158
Write 4,077
Mixed 1,203
SusWrite 1,076
480% 2,128 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 53.1
195% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 597
426% 556 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 236%
Great: 308%
Amd-raid Array 3 813GB
631GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 71 63 65 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
Read 87.6
Write 92.5
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 71.9
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.1
86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
84GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 31 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 36.6
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 30.9
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.3
148% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
904GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 41.3
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 41.8
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
181% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Cruzer 2GB
1GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.3 5.5 5.4 5.9 5.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 3.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.3
10% 9.53 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 34.6
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 33.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 70: 8R 10G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
70% 69% 26 332 269 144 24" 1920 1080 AOC2460 2460G4
History: Score 48: 5R 4G 11B | Score 59: 7R 8G 0B | Score 70: 8R 10G 0B
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II Builds (Compare 5,538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback