Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '21 at 06:58
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 89.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 251 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 740 74% 599 Pts	64-Core 992 61% 992 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.6% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 32.2 28% 34.8 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 24.8 18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP S700 250GB-$46 9,815 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 220 154 5.3 227 171 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 305 Write 3.2 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 180 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 26% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 224GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 116 134 172 174 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 25.5 Write 136 Mixed 38 SusWrite 150 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hewlett-Packard 7EH64AA# 2x8GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.5% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 20.6 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 22 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	363x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	214x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	209x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	150x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	140x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,041

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16