Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 08:41
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 183
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 257
43% 302 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 47.4
31% 39.1 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 22.1
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 253
Write 219
Mixed 229
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 1.1
48% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 57.2
DQ Mixed 43
52% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$66
412GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 182 188 187 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 158
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 183
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 7R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 20% 97 279 186 60 33.3" 1920 1080 CVT1080
History: Score 13: 1R 1G 5B | Score 57: 7R 5G 7B
Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback