PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-R (all builds) |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180326 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 11 '21 at 04:57 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | HRV-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
82.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 453 416 297 297 299 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 128GB-$13
57GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 45 43 44 44 MB/s
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB
26GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 25 17 25 25 MB/s
|
25.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905584-022.A00LF 99U5584-003.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
59.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 6 | 60 | 23.1" | 1280 720 | GSM5A49 24MB35 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 136x |
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 88x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 59x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 38x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $281 |