Samsung Q470C/500P4C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung Q470C/500P4C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP500P4C-AD3BR
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '17 at 21:21
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 179
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 448
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C650) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3368
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 2.94
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.09
5% 5.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Unidade de disco 1TB
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 91.2
Mixed 81.8
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.2
48% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 0194 SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q470C/500P4C Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Q470C/500P4C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback