Biostar H61MGC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H61MGC  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1824 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 08:06
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 180
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 376
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 2293) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 15.6
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 45 55 50 63 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 231
Write 204
Mixed 194
SusWrite 61.1
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 18
79% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 93
DQ Mixed 21.7
27% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 94%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
88GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 75 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 54.2
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 73.6
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 PC 8G 1600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 8R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 17% 101 187 126 60 31.5" 1824 1014 SHP10A1 SHARP HDMI
History: Score 34: 3R 5G 4B | Score 57: 8R 4G 5B
Typical H61MGC Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MGC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback