Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCSR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 19:03
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 3.93
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 166
37% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 284
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 44.9
38% 54.4 fps
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 40.9
37% 41.7 fps
Poor: 29% Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ5 512GB
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 406 385 260 282 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 517
Write 547
Mixed 545
SusWrite 307
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 25.7
88% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 352
278% 390 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.4
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 464
9% 464 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 3R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 19% 47 151 56 120 15.5" 1536 864 AUOD0ED
Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 3,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback