Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SEXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 23:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 220
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 586
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 144
Parallax 6.7
5% 52.2 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ5 512GB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 742 558 348 371 369 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 632
Write 796
Mixed 706
SusWrite 533
151% 667 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 49.6
175% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 801
611% 830 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 149%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback