Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 18:47
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 736
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2032 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 113
Parallax 103
86% 107 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 100
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 209 204 201 209 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 447
Mixed 262
SusWrite 213
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 42.2
143% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 260
221% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
0GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.2
Write 66.9
Mixed 58.3
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB
233GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 28 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 27.1
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 26.8
37% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 36.5
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 2R 10G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 38% 48 339 278 60 23.8" 1920 1080 DELA0BE DELL P2415Q
History: Score 13: 0R 3G 4B | Score 46: 2R 10G 6B
Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $928
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $367
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback