Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181130
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '21 at 19:32
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 42 1-Core 22.5 2-Core 47.3 24% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 73.7 8-Core 113 12% 93.4 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 37.3 Parallax 6.2 2% 15.2 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 673 407 392 432 431 421 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 899 Write 1,344 Mixed 774 SusWrite 459 196% 869 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 38.1 128% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 229 171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 302%
Team T253E2001T 1TB 971 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 580GB free Firmware: S1230A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 326 333 365 363 352 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 427 Write 365 Mixed 367 SusWrite 348 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 17.6 69% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 48.8 75% 142 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 20.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	5	60	12.6"	1360 768	NCS2275

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,695x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	921x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,558x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,057x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	325x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	877x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16