ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140912
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '15 at 03:56
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$132 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 89.2 2-Core 195 64% 142 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 389 43% 340 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 58% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2AF3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.76% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 6.35 Parallax 6.06 3% 5.46 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 7.57 5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.76% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$70 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 183 7775 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 23 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6910 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 21 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 233 (C2) HDA temperature 117 106 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46.9% Average	Read 88.6 Write 74.7 Mixed 88.6 64% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.2 70% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 36663928 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 121 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 9060711949 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14353 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 111 (B4) Unknown 100 100 442906041 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12885098499 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 9229565987 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 22144 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 -140737488355293 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	84.9% Excellent	Read 130 Write 166 Mixed 122 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.28 81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 114%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 134GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 110GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 22.4 Mixed 8.73 24% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.15 15% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 45%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 45GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 13 Mixed 17.6 24% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.83 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.5 53% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 38%
Lexar JumpDrive 32GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 15GB free, PID 0700 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 22.9 Mixed 8.04 24% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.23 24% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback