Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCEL3S1R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCEL3S1R  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 10:57
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 39.3
1-Core 4.8
2-Core 18.2
16% 20.8 Pts
4-Core 27.6
8-Core 26.3
4% 27 Pts
64-Core 32
2% 32 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sony(104D 908D) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 226 285 292 328 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 334
Write 334
Mixed 269
SusWrite 280
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 13.4
44% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 58.1
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 55
41% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 104%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
37GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Read 21
Write 20
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 15
25% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 45%
Innostor Ext. HDD 500GB
400GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 16.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 14.6
24% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 8GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.1
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMO15A7
Typical VPCEL3S1R Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEL3S1R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback