Today's hottest deals

HP 500-413no

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP 500-413no  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 08 '16 at 16:52
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 138
55% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 256
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 39.9
39% 44.6 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 37.3
Mixed 21.5
23% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 112%
Innostor Ext. HDD 500GB
59GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 41
Write 42.6
Mixed 42
54% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 9.66
934% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 10.5
1,074% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-413no Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-413no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback