Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515MA
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime8 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 10:29
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 111
40% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 117
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 154C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 656 730 319 319 312 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 752
Write 745
Mixed 770
SusWrite 439
152% 677 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 39.5
137% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 251
189% 253 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 111%
Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO81EC
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515MA_X515MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback