AZW SEi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZW SEi  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SEi
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 223
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 472
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(1E50 800C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 14.9
10% 12.7 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 13.6
9% 10 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0521A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 382 140 499 629 855 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,218
Write 193
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 479
164% 739 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 32.1
201% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 175
170% 272 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 151%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.4% Very good
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 13.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SEi Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW SEi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback