Average Bench: 50.6% (98th of 115)

Based on 164 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB

Average average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB averaged 49.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 20.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 19.9GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB is 46.9%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 13.3GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 104ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 164 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.2 MC Read 19.9 36.5
11.5 MC Write 20.1 43.6
10.7 MC Mixed 13.5 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.93 SC Read 14.1 18.4
11 SC Write 16.7 21.3
5.7 SC Mixed 13.3 16.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
61.8 Latency 104 141
38.6% 104 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 11.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 7.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 11.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 10.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 11.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
164 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,196,124 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB Builds (Compare 717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: AZW SEi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback