Today's hottest deals

AZW SEi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW SEi  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SEi
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 00:01
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 232
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 518
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(1E50 800C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 13.6
10% 12.2 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 13.2
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1030 1101 303 279 293 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,370
Write 1,108
Mixed 1,114
SusWrite 547
232% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 74.3
268% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 695
DQ Mixed 800
593% 785 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 206%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 13.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SEi Builds (Compare 745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW SEi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback