Today's hottest deals

AZW S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW S3  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW S3
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 16:43
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 196
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 515
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 11
Parallax 18.3
10% 14 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 10.2
8% 9.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 279 287 286 286 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 286
Mixed 361
SusWrite 285
104% 474 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 35.3
156% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 337
263% 367 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 222%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
859GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 435 432 453 421 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 449
Mixed 427
SusWrite 429
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 34.7
112% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 252
189% 253 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback