Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 89 2-Core 149 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 454 44% 361 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 39 45 64 60 54 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 247 Write 51.3 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 54.5 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 7.7 55% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 72.9 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 1.4 19% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 83%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 141 176 172 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 165 Mixed 101 SusWrite 157 107% 145 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.8 265% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 4x8GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.3% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 10.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	324x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	303x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	60x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $219

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16