Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 08:27
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 165
2-Core 330
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,078
104% 856 Pts
64-Core 1536
95% 1536 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2662 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 144
Parallax 132
107% 136 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 135
Splatting 121
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1383 923 474 592 787 886 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 696
Write 1,442
Mixed 2042
SusWrite 841
287% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 73.7
231% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 567
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 119
195% 379 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 175%
Great: 486%
APS-SE20Q-2T 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM52.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 1463 1790 1799 1796 1790 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 668
Mixed 287
SusWrite 1,556
156% 679 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 18.9
93% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 569
434% 593 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 158%
Great: 369%
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 82A7TBAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1594 1598 1600 1602 1609 1605 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,580
Write 1,020
Mixed 1,454
SusWrite 1,601
370% 1,664 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 71.6
244% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 504
385% 527 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 301%
Great: 458%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
132GB free
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 490 472 472 472 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 569
Write 57.8
Mixed 506
SusWrite 480
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 45.9
157% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 227
201% 291 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 115%
Great: 157%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 113
Write 15.7
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 29.9
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 64%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 31 31 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 303
Write 30.2
Mixed 146
SusWrite 34.8
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.3
1,740% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 101%
Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.3
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback