HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 175
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 640
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 2,029
126% 2,029 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 18.4
12% 17.3 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 15.5
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 218 217 207 215 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.7% Above average
Read 226
Write 219
Mixed 226
SusWrite 216
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 26.9
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 184
138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 241%
Hitachi HUS724030ALS640 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: A1C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 45 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 173
Write 44.1
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 44.3
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HUS724030ALS640 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: A1C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 186
Write 45.5
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 44
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 105%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: FEFE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 154 153 151 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 152
Write 153
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 152
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NL-CG 8x8GB
8 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 6% 122 267 200 60 19.1" 1440 900 OLD9996 Olidata TW999
History: Score 21: 2R 2G 5B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 13: 1R 1G 5B
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback