Biostar Hi-Fi A70U3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi A70U3P  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 05:05
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Memory 40.9
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 29.5
22% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 36.9
8-Core 38.2
5% 37.6 Pts
64-Core 38
2% 38 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Biostar(1565 1708) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 128GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 11 9.3 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 38.7
Mixed 290
SusWrite 10.1
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 70.1
237% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 130
102% 141 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 91%
Ccboot iSCSI 936GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 11 9.4 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
Read 79.2
Write 20.7
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 10.3
10% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 31.8
73% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 145
98% 117 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gloway WAR3U1600C11041C 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical Hi-Fi A70U3P Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A70U3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback