Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '21 at 11:05
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$153 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 109 54% 85 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 381 37% 306 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 70.6 Parallax 63.2 54% 66.5 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 55.7 51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-512M6S+ 512GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 251 237 290 231 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 333 Write 274 Mixed 226 SusWrite 234 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 25.7 92% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 63.3 DQ Mixed 31.1 28% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 47GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 305 269 228 207 190 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 399 Write 382 Mixed 300 SusWrite 234 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 42.5 138% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 39.6 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 53.7 45% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 5,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.7% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	27"	1280 720	APP9226 LED Cinema

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $127Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	128x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	74x
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	60x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365