Asrock AB350M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 09:20
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 203
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 430
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 37.6
29% 38.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 27.2
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 48GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 14 16 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 48.3
Write 22
Mixed 52
SusWrite 13.6
8% 34 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 13
43% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 11.7
9% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 17%
Richdisk device 21GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 15 16 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 69.8
Write 34.5
Mixed 63
SusWrite 13.6
10% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 12.9
43% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 13.8
10% 13.9 MB/s
Richdisk device 268GB
61GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 15 16 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 69
Write 24.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 13.6
9% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 13.1
39% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 13.6
10% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 5 50 27" 1279 720 ACR0674 Acer VG270
Typical AB350M-HDV Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback