Today's hottest deals

HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A90h
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 03:42
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 122
61% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 305
36% 278 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Gigabyte(1458 229A) 3GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 65.9
37% 50 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 26.9
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,610
Write 2,048
Mixed 2,472
530% 2,377 MB/s
4K Read 110
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 52.8
270% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 212
157% 209 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
2GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 232
Write 214
Mixed 197
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 23.1
78% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 188
141% 188 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
286GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 89.7
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.3
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 174%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA026 DELL2407WFPHC
Typical hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback