bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC5i5RYB
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 00:15
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 121
49% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 137
22% 155 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 2057) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 10.3
6% 6.6 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 133 185 202 240 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 428
Write 403
Mixed 359
SusWrite 205
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 290
217% 291 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
453GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 153 199 225 289 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 416
Write 346
Mixed 361
SusWrite 237
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 37.6
133% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 318
238% 319 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-432.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22C1 VX228
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback