Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 01:38
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 135
59% 99 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 309
32% 256 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 7
5% 26.4 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.4
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 81 71 71 80 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.1% Average
Read 47.9
Write 107
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 76.1
18% 80 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 15.5
96% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 201
176% 273 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 153%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
426GB free
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 104 104 113 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 118
Write 127
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 109
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 14.1
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 6R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 19% 77 273 190 120 15.5" 1536 864 NCP0036
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT Builds (Compare 775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback