Today's hottest deals

HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory120.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 15:49
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 70.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 1,000
89% 753 Pts
64-Core 2,068
128% 2,068 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
HP(103C 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 138
Parallax 124
98% 127 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 109
Splatting 119
107% 133 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 316 286 278 260 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,887
Write 639
Mixed 420
SusWrite 298
176% 811 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 64.6
240% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 705
557% 786 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 204%
Great: 292%
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
101GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 196 187 187 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 431
Write 190
Mixed 218
SusWrite 190
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 15
107% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 29.5
74% 159 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Crucial MTFDDAK1T0TDL-1AW1ZABHA 1TB
479GB free
Firmware: HPC0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 475 474 476 477 477 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 475
Mixed 394
SusWrite 476
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 49.4
168% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 351
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 114%
Great: 116%
WDC WD12 1KRYZ-01W0RB0 12TB
7TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.6 7.1 8.6 9.8 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 8.1
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 81%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 43 53 57 42 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 56.4
Write 50.7
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 52.4
66% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
457GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 16 8.5 9.8 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 38
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 14.5
42% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
218GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 21 26 29 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 49.4
Write 47.9
Mixed 45
SusWrite 24.1
55% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 59.4
MC Mixed 38.6
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 110%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 1R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 7% 112 330 261 60 31.5" 2560 1440 PHLC204 PHL 328E1
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback