Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 03:34
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 1,183
98% 851 Pts
64-Core 2,827
175% 2,827 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 172
Parallax 373
144% 241 fps
MRender 281
Gravity 124
Splatting 176
155% 194 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 138%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$103
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2000 1725 1728 1728 1733 1732 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 2,227
Mixed 1,841
SusWrite 1,774
443% 1,965 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 79.1
274% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 1,126
848% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 325%
Great: 347%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
145GB free
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 134 127 131 135 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 456
Write 289
Mixed 133
SusWrite 155
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 8.2
62% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 49.9
DQ Mixed 29.9
24% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 55%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 180 189 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 185
Mixed 130
SusWrite 183
230% 169 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.5
405% 5.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 4.5
DQ Mixed 1.8
218% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 97%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 188 185 185 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 194
Mixed 127
SusWrite 188
236% 174 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.5
410% 5.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 4.3
DQ Mixed 1.8
211% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
115GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 147
Write 34.8
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 35.1
84% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.4
238% 4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
114GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 34 39 39 39 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 159
Write 78.4
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 44.7
106% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.5
143% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 41%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 38.4
Write 38.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 38.9
49% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 3.7 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 39.6
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 6.9
40% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
110% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 12 20 20 14 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 16.8
43% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 54%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 31 20 20 18 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 38
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 17.5
42% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 59%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 494GB
460GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 19 28 30 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 149
Write 64.3
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 39
95% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
128% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 37.7
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 34.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 VSC5138 VX3276-UHD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback