HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EB
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 04:14
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 112
48% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 236
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 81EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 61 13 120 39 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 443
Write 358
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 94.3
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 1
28% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 7.2
DQ Mixed 29.3
36% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
618GB free
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 99 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 64.4
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 99.4
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Hynix MXOD408213316XB8R. 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback