User System

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DAL
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111230
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 06:36
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 57.9 2-Core 121 54% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 389 38% 311 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Asus(1043 0418) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Lighting 43.7 Reflection 29 Parallax 30.6 36% 34.4 fps	MRender 51.3 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 61.4 44% 52.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 647GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2219 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 346 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 57 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4386082566	39.3% Below average	Read 225 Write 180 Mixed 180 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 15 58% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 45.2 DQ Mixed 16.7 18% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 133%
WD Re 2TB-$33 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 289GB free Firmware: 01.01D01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8558 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 725 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14282 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 657 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 98 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 626 (C2) HDA temperature 120 86 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.4% Above average	Read 101 Write 99.1 Mixed 70.2 67% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.34 80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 MXIC 25L3205 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 33 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16