ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DAL
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111230
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	May 08 '18 at 12:44
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 120 57% 89.7 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 386 39% 316 Pts	64-Core 620 38% 620 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Asus(1043 0418) 3GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.4.1 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.2% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 29.4 Parallax 53.9 35% 42.2 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 43.1 Splatting 36.4 29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 559GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3712 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 969 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 56 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9805853953	30.1% Below average	Read 195 Write 146 Mixed 154 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 9.7 39% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 11.7 DQ Write 55.2 DQ Mixed 5.49 12% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 133%
WD Re 2TB-$33 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 272GB free Firmware: 01.01D01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8541 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1360 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15763 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1278 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 118 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1241 (C2) HDA temperature 115 86 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	60% Good	Read 103 Write 106 Mixed 35.8 60% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.12 36% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 9JSF25672PZ-1G4D1 MXIC 25L3205 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 33 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.1% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 15.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback