Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210510
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 21:49
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 232
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 676
62% 519 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 157
Parallax 158
129% 158 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 146
Splatting 122
121% 152 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 121%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 119 115 114 114 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 418
Write 187
Mixed 288
SusWrite 122
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 26.8
108% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 38
36% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 128%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
208GB free
Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,910
Write 4,087
Mixed 4,738
1,090% 4,912 MB/s
4K Read 293
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 262
908% 266 MB/s
DQ Read 929
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 849
634% 844 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
368GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 147 150 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 154
Mixed 97
SusWrite 148
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZN BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FBD F4-3000C16-8GTZN 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 18.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 74: 9R 9G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
74% 51% 39 300 235 200 35" 2560 1080 AOC3520 AG352QG2
History: Score 37: 5R 2G 6B | Score 56: 6R 5G 11B | Score 74: 9R 9G 2B
Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $955
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback