Fujitsu FUTRO S920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu FUTRO S920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3313-E1
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 11:57
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-424CC SOC R5E Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 73.3
35% 55 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 131
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1202) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD10M 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20112PmS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 239 305 322 314 360 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 416
Write 344
Mixed 304
SusWrite 306
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 9.9
77% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 17.6
55% 119 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 79%
Generic External 16GB
13GB free, PID 3960
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 28 28 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.7% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 26.6
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 27.4
38% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.4
162% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 19" 1280 720 ACR001D Acer B193
Typical FUTRO S920 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FUTRO S920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback