Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 13:22
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 836
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,095
68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 194
Parallax 186
144% 185 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 183
Splatting 127
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 176 178 181 177 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,682
Write 1,076
Mixed 479
SusWrite 237
191% 868 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 53.3
202% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1203
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 648
606% 944 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 192%
Great: 236%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
329GB free
Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1176 1219 930 48 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,006
Write 1,265
Mixed 890
SusWrite 580
211% 935 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 71.4
236% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 717
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 879
632% 806 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 183%
Great: 299%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 120GB
92GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 142 142 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63% Good
Read 380
Write 313
Mixed 334
SusWrite 173
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 29.1
95% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 117
102% 151 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
167GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 64 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 92.5
Write 83.7
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 63.6
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 58%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
207GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 98.5
Write 95.4
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 67.1
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 159 161 161 160 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 149
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 158
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
48GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 140
Write 114
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 95.4
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 25.3
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 74: 8R 7G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
74% 29% 97 268 188 144 24.5" 1920 1080 BNQ7F7D BenQ EX2510
History: Score 59: 8R 2G 13B | Score 74: 8R 7G 13B
Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $990
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback