Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 03:52
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 521
60% 467 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 40.7
28% 37.3 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 33.4
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZH100-47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 32 32 33 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 12.5
Write 46.3
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 31.2
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 32%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
305GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 175 177 176 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 126
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 174
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
67GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 103 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 102
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
185GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 44.2
Write 3
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 1.7
10% 13.8 MB/s
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 47%
Maxtor STM380211AS 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 69.5
Write 62.1
Mixed 40
SusWrite 69.9
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 70 0" 1028 720 Default
Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback