Toshiba Satellite C655D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C655D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110623
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	JOR-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-50 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Memory 18.2 1-Core 10.7 2-Core 21.9 11% 16.9 Pts	4-Core 21.4 8-Core 22.8 3% 22.1 Pts	64-Core 22.3 1% 22.3 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250 1,583 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDE8) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M320MBB 320GB 730 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 25 29 32 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 11.2 Write 50.7 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 30.2 20% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT112S6TFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 3GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.11% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.1 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1.9 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 334 12% 334 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 11%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO22EC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C655D Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C655D

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	10x
C-50AMDBench 21%, 1,781 samples	8x
Athlon II P340AMD $50Bench 35%, 2,473 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	17x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	8x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	7x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x
Sol id State Disk 120GBSpccBench 52%, 499 samples	2x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	3x
M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,750 samples	2x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397