Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C655D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 16:39
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	JOR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-50 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Memory 43.7 1-Core 12.4 2-Core 24.3 20% 26.8 Pts	4-Core 24.3 8-Core 23.9 3% 24.1 Pts	64-Core 24.4 2% 24.4 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M320MBB 320GB 730 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 87 89 80 89 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 86 Write 76.9 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 83.2 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT112S6TFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 3GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 11%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	17x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	8x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	7x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x
Sol id State Disk 120GBSpccBench 52%, 499 samples	2x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	3x
M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,750 samples	2x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	2x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $134