Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 16:57
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 69
34% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 122
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 381A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.7.3
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.6 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN01SM21NT256MT 256GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 351 355 344 355 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 401
Write 315
Mixed 325
SusWrite 350
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 15.2
86% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 27.9
58% 116 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
462GB free
Firmware: GS2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 29
SusWrite 113
66% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC2P1-B1AH Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 4 60 14" 1366 768 LGD0455
Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback