Huananzhi X58

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X58 (all builds)
Memory	18.5 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 134 61% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 458 45% 369 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.2% Average	Lighting 62.8 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 75.5 51% 66.9 fps	MRender 57.7 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 42.1 42% 53.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD 240G B 240GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: S042 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 23 1.6 1.6 4.6 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 325 Write 242 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 24.9 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 270GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 102 105 103 105 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 96.3 Mixed 32 SusWrite 101 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.5 198% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 88%
Buildwin Media-Player 0GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.68% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.68 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 1%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 20.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.1 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23.5"	1280 720	PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	29x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	20x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	16x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MZ7KM240HMHQ0D3 240GBBench 98%, 30 samples	7x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	5x

RAM
1x33GB^Y[fXfPV(@XZBench 31%, 36 samples	12x
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 37GBUnknownBench 43%, 9 samples	7x
HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GBHynixBench 49%, 6 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16