Acer Veriton M498G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M498G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M498G
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 01:40
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 174
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 384
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 29.3
16% 36.3 fps
MRender 46.4
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 17.5
22% 28.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250620NS 250GB-$45
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3BKS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 22 29 58 49 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 67
Write 71.3
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 45.1
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
10GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 49 54 61 61 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 64
Write 55.8
Mixed 43
SusWrite 57.6
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
240GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 21 49 21 57 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 64
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 36.6
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 42%
WD Elements 2TB
39GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 25 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 21.1
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 23.8
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLZ3128M8-EDJ6C 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 06C1 SLZ3128M8-EDJ6C 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP326F HP E242
Typical Veriton M498G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Veriton M498G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $359
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback