Acer Aspire XC-830

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-830  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-830(DCH)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 07:11
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5040
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 69.4
29% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 94.2
8-Core 114
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 93.2
6% 93.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Acer(1025 1226) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7871
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3.8
1% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 123 134 148 133 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 146
Write 137
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 133
78% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 5% 107 9 2 60 7.2" 1920 1080 SAM0665 SAMSUNG
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 19: 3R 1G 1B
Typical Aspire XC-830 Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-830

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback