Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory101.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 17:55
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K
, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 167
2-Core 332
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,217
113% 943 Pts
64-Core 2,230
138% 2,230 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 211
Parallax 203
180% 212 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
130% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 326 322 326 309 252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 3945
Write 1,343
Mixed 2,138
SusWrite 361
427% 1,947 MB/s
4K Read 208
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 131
536% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 1,219
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 842
650% 902 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 383%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
130GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,915
Write 10,841
Mixed 10,724
2,352% 10,493 MB/s
4K Read 705
4K Write 482
4K Mixed 551
2,030% 579 MB/s
DQ Read 1,673
DQ Write 1,055
DQ Mixed 1,290
981% 1,339 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 117%
Plextor M8Se NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$34
81GB free
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 218 219 221 309 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,328
Write 968
Mixed 903
SusWrite 268
193% 867 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 50.5
166% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 609
500% 719 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 156%
Great: 172%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
41GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 321 321 320 321 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 488
Mixed 466
SusWrite 332
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 53.7
178% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$138
191GB free
Firmware: CC13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,457
Write 10473
Mixed 10,561
7,679% 10,164 MB/s
4K Read 692
4K Write 470
4K Mixed 535
96,970% 565 MB/s
DQ Read 1,699
DQ Write 1,115
DQ Mixed 1,349
12,543% 1,388 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 73%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
294GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,377
Write 9217
Mixed 8676
6,361% 8,423 MB/s
4K Read 348
4K Write 400
4K Mixed 455
72,431% 401 MB/s
DQ Read 1,677
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 1,324
12,303% 1,360 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$48
513GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8978
Write 11,293
Mixed 9,771
7,540% 10,014 MB/s
4K Read 715
4K Write 482
4K Mixed 553
100,141% 583 MB/s
DQ Read 1,782
DQ Write 1,157
DQ Mixed 1,402
13,059% 1,447 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 86%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
418GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 105 107 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 75.1
Write 105
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 106
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,800
Write 9,612
Mixed 8,276
6,445% 8,563 MB/s
4K Read 574
4K Write 384
4K Mixed 537
90,732% 498 MB/s
DQ Read 1,714
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1381
12,771% 1,405 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 30.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 31.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0FDE C32JG5x
Typical GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 2,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $972
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback