Asus H81M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 15:46
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3258-$31 23,497 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 43.4 1-Core 15.8 2-Core 26.1 21% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 32.3 8-Core 51.4 5% 41.8 Pts	64-Core 45.7 3% 45.7 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 18 Parallax 18.2 15% 18 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 19 Splatting 16.8 14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA240CV10001 240GB 1,293 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: STWSN010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 196 212 227 251 227 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.1% Below average	Read 180 Write 194 Mixed 177 SusWrite 203 43% 189 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 7 29% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 112 96% 139 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 21GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.7 5 4.6 4.6 4.5 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Read 30.9 Write 2.7 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 4.7 13% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 23% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 5.7 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 53: 8R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
53%	21%	63	101	31	60	23.8"	1920 1080	SAM1023 S24R65x

History: Score 37: 5R 2G 6B | Score 48: 6R 6G 0B | Score 53: 8R 4G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,186x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	503x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	491x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	566x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	479x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	169x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	149x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	91x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16