Today's hottest deals

HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 255 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 21:19
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27.6% Poor
Memory 41.6
1-Core 55.6
2-Core 83.7
36% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 79.3
8-Core 85.2
11% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 5.2
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TDL-1AW1ZABHA 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 215 203 187 196 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 287
Write 272
Mixed 225
SusWrite 203
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 8.5
41% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 8 20 5 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO38ED
Typical 255 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback